i think of today and laugh.
Have so much to blog about, have so little time. MSJDFLSJDFLKJS
i apologise for the inconvenience caused.
On another note ( a more serious one)
Sorry for the long article next, singaporeans-- you've probably seen this before.
Pub Date: 27/09/2005 Pub: ST Page: 1
Headline: Schools act against students for flaming' teachers on blogs
By: Sandra Davie & Liaw Wy-Cin
Subject: Students, Internet
Related Stories:
Malaysians hounded by vicious blogging too
FREE speech may be the buzzword on the Internet - but libel is unacceptable
everywhere.
The message has been sent out loud and clear, with five junior college
students being punished for posting offensive remarks about two teachers and a
vice-principal online.
The students, all girls, were made to remove the remarks from their Internet
diaries, or blogs, and suspended for three days last month. Their parents were
also informed.
The case is not an isolated one. Of the 31 secondary schools and junior
colleges contacted, 18 said they were seeing more such incidents as the number
of bloggers surges.
Seven secondary schools and two JCs have asked bloggers who criticise or
insult their teachers online - 'flaming' in Internet jargon - to remove the
offending remarks.
One such remark referred to a secondary school teacher as a 'prude' for
disciplining a student for wearing a too-short skirt. 'Frustrated old spinster.
Can't stand to see attractive girls,' the blog read.
Tanglin Secondary science and PE teacher Tham Kin Loong said: 'I've had
vulgarities hurled against me, my parents and my whole family in some students'
blogs.'
The 33-year-old added: 'Most of them do not realise the legal implications
of what they are writing in such a public domain.'
If teachers wish to prosecute, they may have legal grounds to do so.
Singapore Teachers' Union general secretary Swithun Lowe said the union is
ready to back any teacher who wants to take legal action. It has offered legal
help to a few members, but they did 'not want to affect the prospects of their
young students'.
Lawyers say students can be sued for defamation, even if a teacher is not
named. 'As long as someone is able to identify the teacher, and it is an untrue
statement that affects his reputation or livelihood, then the student is
liable,' said Ms Doris Chia of Harry Elias and Partners.
An injunction can be taken to get the student to remove the blog and issue
an apology, she added.
But none of the schools contacted by The Straits Times has banned blogging.
Rather, many English and General Paper teachers encourage it to improve
students' language and writing skills.
Schools also said they do not police blogs. They say they only check them
after complaints are made.
'And if we feel that the remark is untrue or unfair, then we expect the
student to apologise,' said Raffles Institution vice-principal S. Magendiran.
The recent cases of two young men and a teen charged with making seditious
and inflammatory remarks about Muslims on the Net have led to teachers
discussing the dos and don'ts of blogging with students.
It is not known exactly how many student bloggers there are, but after a
recent school blogging competition, the Media Development Authority called the
practice a 'raging phenomenon among the youth'.
The MOE said it does not issue guidelines to schools on blogging, but leaves
it to them to take appropriate action.
OFFENSIVE POSTS
'Frustrated old spinster. Can't stand to see attractive girls.'
- SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENT, about a teacher who disciplined a girl for
wearing too short a skirt.
FAMILY IN FIRING LINE
'I've had vulgarities hurled against me, my parents and my whole family in some
students' blogs.'
- MR THAM KIN LOONG, 33. He is on Tanglin Secondary School's discipline and
pupil welfare committees.
AND
Pub Date: 18/09/2005 Pub: ST Page: 23
Column: headliners
Day: Sunday
Headline: Nicholas Lim (left), Benjamin Koh and Gan Huai Shi - Alleged
racist bloggers
Page Heading: think
Notes:
Picture
IN THE first case of its kind, Lim, 25, and Koh, 27, were charged with making
seditious and inflammatory remarks about Muslims on the Internet last week.
Lim, an assistant marketing manager, allegedly posted anti-Muslim remarks on
an online forum for dog lovers in Singapore, www.doggiesite.com.
Koh, who works at a kennel, was said to have made similar racist comments on
his blog, Phoenyx Chronicles, on www.upsaid.com on several occasions.
The two face charges under the Sedition Act, which has been in place since
1948.
A few days later, private school student Gan, 17, was hauled up for making
inflammatory comments about Malays and Muslims on his weblog or online journal.
Singaporeans are making the news again, in all the wrong way.
IF YOU GO TO ANY FING NEWS WEBSITE YOU CAN SEE SINGAPORE ON THE TOP OF THE F-ING NEWS FOR THIS F-ING THING, in every single language in like every major country.
I wish the government will start to take everything a step at a time instead of throwing the book at anything that moves.
Oops. is that going to get me in trouble with the Sedition Act?
P.S. I am in no way supporting racism, but it's just that the three bloggers weren't even given a single chance. AT ALL. NOT AT ALL. So why the F?